Monday, September 20, 2004, 00:03 GMT
''hurt'', ''beat'' and ''cost'' have past tenses?
|
Why don't the words ''spit'', ''hit'', ''split'', ''wed'', ''wet'
Monday, September 20, 2004, 00:03 GMT
''hurt'', ''beat'' and ''cost'' have past tenses?
Monday, September 20, 2004, 01:18 GMT
"Spat" is a past tense of "spit."
A little suggestion...why not go to your local library and try to find a book on the evolution of English or English linguistics? I think you might actually find answers to all of these questions, rather than posting them incessantly on Antimoon.
Monday, September 20, 2004, 07:33 GMT
Sometimes, you've just got to accept things as they are, d'ye ken?
Monday, September 20, 2004, 20:13 GMT
<<d'ye ken?>>
Random's been scoffing yon porage oats again! ;-)
Monday, September 20, 2004, 23:40 GMT
Of course they have past tenses. "Cost" is the past tense of "cost". "Beat" is the past tense of "beat". "Hurt" is the past tense of "hurt". Etc.
Monday, September 20, 2004, 23:43 GMT
Jim sez:
<< "Beat" is the past tense of "beat">> Are these two words pronounced the same?
Monday, September 20, 2004, 23:44 GMT
Yes.
Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 00:06 GMT
I used to pronounce the past tense of beat as in the pronuncaition of the word "bet".
Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 02:47 GMT
But the past tense of "read"... That's really weird!
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 11:14 GMT
"read" is the past tense of "read" but you should pronounce the past tense as "red."
|