There must be many reasons, but the main thing is still that, tautologically, you fail to find something that keeps you going. It could be a nice language course or a part of culture or a person you like.
I'm afraid that this happens very often among many people, and especially young people, since I think most learners should be pretty young before they practically become too busy.
I don't know how Skippy has learnt French for 3 years, but AFAIK, learning French for 3 years in Hong Kong is roughly like: Option 1) You learn at AF, pay a huge amount of money, say some 15 USD per lesson (and you can tell how much it is for a season), for very "relaxing" lessons amounting to just 100 hours or so in 2 seasons. Or 3 hours in a row every week? If the learner doesn't even have the idea of getting independent - I mean, in relation to your own age (well into early adulthood like me) and in terms of how much you know about language acquisition as an average Joe - then while 1000 hours of lessons would probably do, that costs an awful lot of money and time.
Option 2) Learn it at university. First, you must be in the right university (just like some high schools in US; not every one offers language X). Second, it must be popular enough or else no one teaches it. Third, you must settle for the right schedule, the right teacher(s), the right course settings...........And guys, you and I have a different life, but I know what you do at university. Do you socialize a lot? Do you read a lot of books for your major? Do you do jobs? Do you date? When everyone has a life, I find it, well, while a course is still better than none, it IS just so.
In my city, most students only study for 3 years, and 3 years are just 6 semesters. At least for me, it's stupid to learn a grammar in SIX semesters. Grammar is just a book, but in your mental framework, it should be interlaced heavily with vocab you know. So, on one hand, you can't take the abstraction (grammar) from the reality (context) and think the former is real; on the other, even worse, I think it isn't economical at all to learn the abstraction in 6 semesters before I try to make the sense out of the reality. Life is short, and very often in the 6th semester people are already seeking jobs, BUT guess what, the many vocabulary gaps that 6-semester lessons would leave would simply make that abstract knowledge not work. In short, you would be nowhere near passable fluency to do anything - even if you don't write and speak, like just to read a novel or... a dinner menu.
I still haven't taken into account people who immediately think (I mean, Chinese) 'French verbs and words are terribly difficult to decode' even at the first glance. There must be 3) 4) 5), too, but I think it's useless to talk about them. People say 'go to France to learn'. Again, antimoon's learning guides show clearly how it may or may not work. This is gibberish because, if I can stay in France tomorrow (and even forever), why should I bother to 'learn' French at all? If I already have the money, I wouldn't be asking a stupid question expecting stupid answers. If I say N) motivation is the single way of getting myself going, that is gibberish, either - I sort of need the many lines above to show my POV. I used to post quite like this in forums in my native language, but I simply saw the stupidity of some grown-ups as a little prince. Yeah, so I think this forum is good.
|