Wednesday, June 09, 2004, 01:03 GMT
The last time I checked his map data was a few months ago (so I assume little if any has changed since).
There were a few places on his maps where my experience didn't match his results, but then I'm neither a linguist nor have I explicitly tried to test people on their speech :-). I notice that he really doesn't have what I consider a lot of samples in the west. If I remember correctly, the Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington, area had a few samples (certainly less than 10) where supposedly there was no caught/cot distinction. At the time, I wondered whether the test subjects were native to the area or had relocated from elsewhere.
Some of his samples I could get data about by clicking on the dot. Supposedly a sound sample was available, but I could not play it on my system.
There were a few places on his maps where my experience didn't match his results, but then I'm neither a linguist nor have I explicitly tried to test people on their speech :-). I notice that he really doesn't have what I consider a lot of samples in the west. If I remember correctly, the Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington, area had a few samples (certainly less than 10) where supposedly there was no caught/cot distinction. At the time, I wondered whether the test subjects were native to the area or had relocated from elsewhere.
Some of his samples I could get data about by clicking on the dot. Supposedly a sound sample was available, but I could not play it on my system.