February

Freeman   Tuesday, December 07, 2004, 04:40 GMT
Do you think that not pronouncing the first ''r'' in the ''February'' is pronouncing ''February'' incorrectly? Let's take a vote.

I pronounce ''February'' as ''Feb-ryoo-ary''.
Freemason   Tuesday, December 07, 2004, 06:00 GMT
Do you think that pronouncing knife without the 'k' is incorrect? Let's take a vote.

I pronounce "knife" as "k-nife"
Freeman   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 01:02 GMT
Just to verify, that person going by the name ''Freemason'' is not me. Anyway, do you think that not pronouncing the first ''r'' in the ''February'' is pronouncing ''February'' incorrectly? Let's take a vote.

I pronounce ''February'' as ''Feb-ryoo-ary''.

My vote is that, yes, it is incorrect.
Steve K   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 01:32 GMT
Febrooary sounds better to me but I am not dogmatic about it.
Mi5 Mick   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 01:45 GMT
Febr..ry or Feby..ry (ignoring the vowels in the second syllable)
Mi5 Mick   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 01:50 GMT
Well, the /../ schwa is an unstressed vowel.
Reggie   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 02:45 GMT
Mi5 Mick wrote:
<<Febr..ry or Feby..ry (ignoring the vowels in the second syllable)>>
<<Well, the /../ schwa is an unstressed vowel.>>

This is an interesting admission. To me it still sounds like the [u:] vowel, only shorter and yet you claim it's a schwa.
Jim   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 02:53 GMT
Me too: a short /u:/.

/febju(:)ri(:)/

Am I incorrect to pronounce it this way? I vote "No."
Freeman   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:10 GMT
Quote-''Me too: a short /u:/.''

''/febju(:)ri(:)/''

Am I incorrect to pronounce it this way? I vote "No."

I vote yes, The correct pronunciation is ''feb-ryoo-ary''?

It's a short [ju:] sound for me as well.
Reggie   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:20 GMT
Dictionary.com has the two variations.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=february

Are non-rhotic speakers wrong in not pronouncing some of the "r's" in words?
Freeman   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:22 GMT
Non-rhotic accents sound sloppy to me. I'm glad that r-dropping is not common in Scotland. In Scotland we continue to pronounce those r's.
Mi5 Mick   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:28 GMT
>>This is an interesting admission. To me it still sounds like the [u:] vowel, only shorter and yet you claim it's a schwa.<<

No claim... it's my pronunciation. Many of my teachers (all natives) at the numerous schools I went to (Victoria, NSW, Queensland) pronounced it this way: /febr..ri/ -- no [u:].
Mi5 Mick   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:30 GMT
Rhotic accents sound clumsy and cumbersome to me :)
Freeman   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:30 GMT
M15 Mick, What about ''January''? How do you pronounce ''January''? I say ''Jan-yoo-ary''.
Freeman   Wednesday, December 08, 2004, 03:31 GMT
''Rhotic accents sound clumsy and cumbersome to me :)''

That's because you like to speak lazily. Pronouncing ''barber'' as ''ba-buh'' is lazy. Pronounce it [ba:rb..r] and you won't be so lazy.