Saturday, June 04, 2005, 20:16 GMT
I do this because "... " means its pronounced (like a sentance) thus the capital letter.
|
Why some countries are better in the learn of english
Previous page Pages: 1 2 3
Saturday, June 04, 2005, 20:16 GMT
I do this because "... " means its pronounced (like a sentance) thus the capital letter.
Saturday, June 04, 2005, 21:10 GMT
Do excuse me Greg, but education has everything to do with it. Studies in second language acquisition (my area of scientific expertise - doing an M.A. in it) consistently show that most errors made by learners of a second/foreign language are universal across linguistic backgrounds.
People in certain countries do better at English because the quality of their English-language education is much higher than in the countries where they do worse. By "quality" I mean type of instruction, the curriculum, teacher competence, class size etc.
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 16:34 GMT
Ved,
If education as you say has something to do with it. Why the swedes, danish, english and germans are so bad with spanish when the french are not?
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 18:27 GMT
=>swedes, danish, english and germans are so bad with spanish when the french are not?<=
Thats very simple...because in those countries (and many more) learning Spanish isn't oblicated,and in most cases not availble.
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 18:40 GMT
Thats very simple...because in those countries (and many more) learning Spanish isn't oblicated,and in most cases not availble.
It is false. Learning spanish is absolutly not obligated in France. We have choice to choose spanish, german or italian as second foreign language.
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 18:57 GMT
Bernard,
I never said that france did btw,but you at least have the option to take it.
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 19:01 GMT
Ved : "Do excuse me Greg". Fine ! It's just I haven't posted anything in that thread yet...
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 23:39 GMT
I think it is a combination of factors. I agree it has do with educational investment and when a person is first exposed to a language that is not their own.
BUT I also think it has got to do with the relative closeness of your native language to the other language. For example, a Spanish person will probably pick up Italian more rapidly than German because of familiarity with words (and presumably grammar). Likewise with a Swede learning German (faster) and Italian (slower). Eg I remember in another post how Ved said that he would find it easier to learn Slovenian over Mandarin (I think) (despite both being grammatically difficult languages). It's simply because Ved is familiar with more of Slovenian vocab than Mandarin vocab, hence learning would be rapid.
Sunday, June 05, 2005, 23:55 GMT
Hmmm.....
L'Etats-Unis d'Amerique, possiblement?
Monday, June 06, 2005, 19:45 GMT
>IN which countries on this list are children from an infant age exposed to listening to English on TV?
Suède 73 Pays-Bas 72 Danemark 61 Norvège 58 Finlande 48 Allemagne 44 Luxembourg 44 Autriche 42 Suisse 40 Belgique 34 (This includes the French speakers if it were just the Flemish it would probably be as high as the Netherlands)< There you go ! See there's a hughe difference between the Walloons and Flemish considering languages
Previous page Pages: 1 2 3
|