"Yes. Have something intelligent to say and write it.
Manytimes, English speakers and readers equate intelligence with presentation (=how it is written/spoken) rather than substance (= *what* is written /spoken)
This is a great travesty. Our language, because of the Romance influx, has leant itself to allowing mere idiots to pass as scholars simply by letting them use a lot of Latinate words.
Think about it. How do we judge whether someone or something is intelligent? By how they write/speak and the words they use. Two people could say the exact same thing (and it could be the stupidest thing at that), and we would judge the Latinate user as "intelligent" and the non-user as uneducated.
We are stupid."
Utter garbage. If someone says or writes something stupid/unintelligent it will sound stupid/unintelligent no matter how latinate words they use. I suspect your subscribing to the whole weak Romance/strong Anglo-Saxon words idea that had some currency during the ultra-nationalistic period of the 19th/20th centuries.
Manytimes, English speakers and readers equate intelligence with presentation (=how it is written/spoken) rather than substance (= *what* is written /spoken)
This is a great travesty. Our language, because of the Romance influx, has leant itself to allowing mere idiots to pass as scholars simply by letting them use a lot of Latinate words.
Think about it. How do we judge whether someone or something is intelligent? By how they write/speak and the words they use. Two people could say the exact same thing (and it could be the stupidest thing at that), and we would judge the Latinate user as "intelligent" and the non-user as uneducated.
We are stupid."
Utter garbage. If someone says or writes something stupid/unintelligent it will sound stupid/unintelligent no matter how latinate words they use. I suspect your subscribing to the whole weak Romance/strong Anglo-Saxon words idea that had some currency during the ultra-nationalistic period of the 19th/20th centuries.