<<Assuming here that by "formal," you mean English that you might expect to see in written form in an article or book or spoken from a prepared text.>>
I disagree somewhat with this definition of formal. I think general tone of discourse has become much less formal over the past fifty years or so, and many books and articles are written in a semi-formal style (not that this is necessarily a bad thing). Basically, formal writing (in my opinion) is limited to academic articles, newspapers--not counting editorials, book reviews, comment pages, etc.--and some non-fiction books--instruction manuals, encyclopedias, but also some 'general interest' books. Also, many exampes of speech from a prepared text are relatively informal; class lectures for example.
I agree with Lazar; there are some verbs for which the middle voice form is one of the standard meanings: 'grow' for example. Other verbs can be used in the middle voice, but are usually informal. Specific fields, like wine tasting perhaps, may include different verbs in the group with standard middle voice meanings.
I disagree somewhat with this definition of formal. I think general tone of discourse has become much less formal over the past fifty years or so, and many books and articles are written in a semi-formal style (not that this is necessarily a bad thing). Basically, formal writing (in my opinion) is limited to academic articles, newspapers--not counting editorials, book reviews, comment pages, etc.--and some non-fiction books--instruction manuals, encyclopedias, but also some 'general interest' books. Also, many exampes of speech from a prepared text are relatively informal; class lectures for example.
I agree with Lazar; there are some verbs for which the middle voice form is one of the standard meanings: 'grow' for example. Other verbs can be used in the middle voice, but are usually informal. Specific fields, like wine tasting perhaps, may include different verbs in the group with standard middle voice meanings.