Our holiday isn't for weeks yet.

NIK   Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:00 am GMT
Our holiday isn't for weeks yet.
what could this sentence mean?
Our holiday short or far away?
furrykef   Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:08 am GMT
It means it's far away: it will still be a few weeks before it's time for the holiday.

- Kef
Guest   Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:53 am GMT
<It means it's far away: it will still be a few weeks before it's time for the holiday. >

What function is the "yet" in that sentense?
furrykef   Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:07 am GMT
It adds a bit of emphasis, although it isn't necessarily stressed when said aloud. The emphasis is on how much time there is until the moment arrives.

- Kef
Guest   Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:35 pm GMT
Looks like a massive redundancy to me.
furrykef   Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:42 pm GMT
Not to me. Emphasis isn't really redundant because it provides extra information, even if the literal meaning of the sentence may contain redundancy.
Pos   Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:40 pm GMT
<Emphasis isn't really redundant because it provides extra information, even if the literal meaning of the sentence may contain redundancy. >

And what extra information is provided by "yet" above?
furrykef   Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:19 pm GMT
I already explained that: it emphasizes the length of time before the moment arrives. Emphasis is extra information.
Guest   Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:48 am GMT
To me "for weeks" expresses long duration - in the mind of the speaker. The addition of "yet" is just another example of excess.
M56   Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:02 am GMT
*"Our holiday isn't for weeks yet, but later it will be for weeks."

I agree with Guest, above, it is illogical and excessive.

Comes from those who don't know how to use "yet".