“V” versus “U” in Classical Latin

?????????????????????????   Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:35 am GMT
How was the “V” pronounced in classical latin ?
was “V” in classical latin pronounced like “U” ?
For example “veni vidi vici” ?
Therefore pronounced as “weni widi wici” ?
Guest   Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:54 am GMT
Or was "V" having a double nature as consonant and vowel ?

how did the Romans pronounced and spelled VENUS ?

was it spelled VENVS ? and how would you know when "V" was pronounced V and when was pronounced U ?
Philx   Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:59 pm GMT
Hi, the romans didn't made distinction between U and V in writingm they had different sounds but they wrote U, V as V. Venus is spelled as in italian venus, you reckon that V is U simply when it is in interconsonantic position. Ex : MINISTRIBVS, between two consonat there is to be a U, not V
Guest   Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:58 pm GMT
thanx Philx
*CarloS*   Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:25 pm GMT
No idea how it was pronounced, but it started a trend. (The "Classical Trend".)

http://166.114.28.115/20030529/images/mundo01.jpg
*CarloS*   Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:27 pm GMT
"PALACIO DE JVSTICIA" = "PALACIO DE JUSTICIA"
greg   Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:50 pm GMT
Les deux se prononçaient [w]. <V> en majuscule et <u> en minuscule.


VIR - uir
Philx   Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:20 pm GMT
Sorry, it is wrong, vis is pronounced vir, there is no difference on writng V or U ofr the romans, but vir pronounced ''[V]ir''
greg   Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:55 pm GMT
Il n'y avait pas de [v] en orolatin classique, Philx. Donc ni <u> ni <V> ne se prononçaient [v].

Précisions :

1/ <u> & <V> pouvaient être réalisés [u] ou [w] ou [uw] (non-répétitition des graphèmes)

2/ <i> & <J> pouvaient être réalisés [i] ou [j] ou [ij] (non-répétitition des graphèmes)
Cicero   Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:15 am GMT
>It is believed that 'v' was originally pronounced as 'w' in Latin even though these things are hard to confirm 100%.<


VNDE EST VERITAS ?
where is the true ?

we know that VNDE is pronounced "unde" and VERITAS "veritas"

IN VINO VERITAS !
the true is in wine !

Roman "V" Undoubtedly was bivalent, equally as “V” and “U”
greg   Sat Feb 11, 2006 1:27 pm GMT
La <VERITAS> = La <ueritas> = La [weritas].

La <VINO> = La <uino> = La [wino].

La <VNDE> = La <unde> = La [unde].

La <V> = La <u> = La [w] [u] [uw].


Les symboles <xxx> signifient des graphèmes (des mots écrits).
Les symboles [xxx] signifient des phones (des sons prononcés).
Philx   Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:00 pm GMT
@ Greg,
Hi, thanks for your precisation, but [V] is not as you may have believed I.P.A grapheme, it is another type of classification used here in italy for the greek and latin, [V] is however not [W], this is what is belived to be in most descriptive grammar but the real correct sound it was in the middle of V,W. Infact the distinction between U n V appeared only in the late empire, and i'm not reffering to orolatin but written one.
guesta   Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:14 am GMT
>La <VERITAS> = La <ueritas> = La [weritas].

La <VINO> = La <uino> = La [wino].

La <VNDE> = La <unde> = La [unde].

La <V> = La <u> = La [w] [u] [uw].

what do you mean ? was VERITAS and VINO pronounced "weritas" and "wino" by the Romans ? than why the Romance languages pronounce VINO ?
Philx   Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:06 am GMT
Infact they pronounced veritas and vino
someone   Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:49 pm GMT
>Infact they pronounced veritas and vino <

Definitely, Roman V, had two meanings, standing as U and V as well.

VENVS was always pronounced "Venus" goddess of love (in Roman Mythology)