|
|
I don't want to pursue this any further because this has nothing to do with language.
All I was contesting was your claim that "humans are not animals."
|
|
|
One of the definitions for rush the noun is: a burst of activity, productivity, or
speed. Hence, "rush hour" when masses of people suddenly exit from their offices
and head towards home, there is a burst of activity. As a verb, rush can be defied
as: to move forward, progress, or act with haste or eagerness... So, rush does not
necessarily connote speed.
|
|
|
Some people call the word ''hamburger'' a crazy English word, but I don't because
they were invented in Hamburg.
|
|
A very few centuries ago anything that flew was called a "bird", including bees,
bats and butterflies. It is really only in recent centuries that we have defined
birds as feathered warm blooded egg-layers. Likewise anything that lived in water
might have been called a "fish" including seals, whales, crabs and octopi.
"Turtle" can mean either a shelled reptile or a dove. The second meaning is obsolete
but is in the King James Bible.
|
|
|
When you write "octopi" do you mean "octopodes", Jack?
|
|
Cambridge dictionary:
noun [C] plural octopuses or octopi
Go learn Latin!
|
|
|
I read in my Marine Biology class last year that the proper plural was "octopods",
something about greek rather than latin roots... sorry, I don't remember more.
|
|
I always remember learning the plural was "octopi." My two favorite on line dictionaries,
www.dictionary.com and the Cambridge dictionary list "octopuses" or "octopi" as the
possible plurals.
After searching google, I think I found an explanation:
Kenneth G. Wilson (1923–). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. 1993.
octopus (n.)
has two plurals: octopuses (pronounced AHK-tuh-pus-iz) and octopi (pronounced AHK-tuh-pei).
Octopod is a relatively rare word, referring to any eight-footed mollusk, including
the octopus; octopod has two plurals: octopods (pronounced AHK-tuh-podz) and octopodes
(pronounced ahk-TAH-puh-deez).
In the end, they're all correct.
|
|
Here is another opinion I found off this Web site.
http://www.oceanicresearch.org/mollusk.html
Octopuses or Octopi?
Many people get confused about the proper plural for the word octopus. Octopus is
frequently given a Latin plural, yet the word derives its second root from Greek,
not Latin (the english "foot" root from Latin is "pod" or "ped", while from Greek
it is "pus"). What is the proper plural, anyway? Many say "octopi." The singular
looks like a Latin masculine singular, ending in "us," but it really isn't, so pluralizing
it to "octopi" is not correct. Most people also mispronounce it as well. If it were
"octopi," it would be pronounced "octo-pee" not "octo-pie," and that sounds silly!
So, the correct plural is "octopuses," believe it or not. I prefer not to use either
of them. Every time you say "octopuses" someone will correct you, and you end up
in an argument. So I like to use "octopods," which is the proper plural of the taxonomic
order Octopoda, containing the eight-armed cephalopods.
|
|
|
So octopod means ''mollusk''.
|
|
|
I call the plural of ''octopus'' as ''octopuses because I pronounce the ''us'' in
octopus differently from the ''us'' in ''cactus''.
|
|
|
If I remember my marine-bio correctly, all octopods are mollusks, but not all mollusks
are octopods. An octopod, as MJD posted, is a cephalopod, (a type of mollusk), with
eight arms; basically, an octopus. It's just easier to say "octopods" for the plural
of "octopus", than to go through all the trouble of explaining to people that "octopuses"
is actually correct. More often than not, people will either not believe you, or
think you're incredibly pretentious. So, I say "octopods", (on the very rare occasions
that the word comes up in my daily life).
|
