Thursday, June 09, 2005, 17:54 GMT
To Brennus,
"and their descendents still live there although they are considered Scottish today. "
I cannot believe you! and they've got eskimo surnames or they mixed with the local population?
"It is believed that a large part of Europe was occupied by peoples related to the Basques and the Lapps (Saami) before the Indo-European invasions from further east and north began c. 2000 B.C. A few ethnologists have suggested that some of the earliest modern inhabitants of the British islands were related to Arctic peoples like the Eskimo but certainly more research needs to be done".
That's very interesting. Have you more information? Where did you read that? So the Basques (or proto-Basques) were occupying the southern part of Europe whereas the Sami were in the northern part. That could explain the physical differences between southern European and northern Europeans.
mmmm...I'm afraid I'm doing some science-fiction archaelogy. Any professional archaelog or ethno-archaelog on Antimoon?
"and their descendents still live there although they are considered Scottish today. "
I cannot believe you! and they've got eskimo surnames or they mixed with the local population?
"It is believed that a large part of Europe was occupied by peoples related to the Basques and the Lapps (Saami) before the Indo-European invasions from further east and north began c. 2000 B.C. A few ethnologists have suggested that some of the earliest modern inhabitants of the British islands were related to Arctic peoples like the Eskimo but certainly more research needs to be done".
That's very interesting. Have you more information? Where did you read that? So the Basques (or proto-Basques) were occupying the southern part of Europe whereas the Sami were in the northern part. That could explain the physical differences between southern European and northern Europeans.
mmmm...I'm afraid I'm doing some science-fiction archaelogy. Any professional archaelog or ethno-archaelog on Antimoon?