Presence of languages on Wikipedia is an indicator of cultural relevancy of languages. Maybe a good one, let's take it for what it's worth.
English is largely predominant in all parameters.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#All_Wikipedias_ordered_by_number_of_articles
Languages with over 200,000 articles:
01. English: 2 532 220 articles
02. German: 795 172
03. French: 697 513
04. Polish: 530 866
05. Japanese: 515 045
06. Italian: 486 296
07. Dutch: 473 414
08. Portuguese: 423 865
09. Spanish: 392 215
10. Russian: 310 676
11. Swedish: 290 214
12. Chinese: 205 019
[ My comment: ] Polish ranking strangely high, Spanish abnormally low.
Total number of pages:
01. English: 2 260 613
02. French: 2 688 202
03. German: 2 260 613
04. Portuguese: 1 636 806
05. Italian: 1 396 753
06. Japanese: 1 297 209
07. Spanish: 1 195 543
08. Russian: 1 112 441
09. Dutch: 1 079 961
10. Polish: 914 017
11. Swedish: 693 383
12. Chinese: 673 048
[ My comment: ] No significant change, other than Polish and Spanish get more sensible rankings.
Depth factor:
"The "Depth" column ((Edits/Articles) × (Non-Articles/Articles) × (Stub-ratio)) is a rough indicator of a Wikipedia’s quality, showing how frequently its articles are updated" — in short, it's an indicator of Wiki collaborativeness;
01. English: 374
02. French: 105
03. German: 78
04. Spanish: 73
05. Russian: 66
06. Chinese 62
07. Portuguese: 61
08. Italian: 50
09. Japanese: 39
10. Dutch: 21
11. Swedish: 20
12. Polish: 8
[ My comment: ] Yep, there was something fishy with Polish!
Users:
01. English: 7 716 575
02. Spanish: 797 157
03. German: 601 619
04. Chinese: 492 713
05. French: 441 318
06. Portuguese: 432 966
07. Italian: 296 668
08. Japanese: 236 024
09. Polish: 211 656
10. Dutch: 182 725
11. Russian: 156 482
12. Swedish: 73 444
[ My comment: ] The Chinese and Hispanics are great users but poor contributors.
English is largely predominant in all parameters.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#All_Wikipedias_ordered_by_number_of_articles
Languages with over 200,000 articles:
01. English: 2 532 220 articles
02. German: 795 172
03. French: 697 513
04. Polish: 530 866
05. Japanese: 515 045
06. Italian: 486 296
07. Dutch: 473 414
08. Portuguese: 423 865
09. Spanish: 392 215
10. Russian: 310 676
11. Swedish: 290 214
12. Chinese: 205 019
[ My comment: ] Polish ranking strangely high, Spanish abnormally low.
Total number of pages:
01. English: 2 260 613
02. French: 2 688 202
03. German: 2 260 613
04. Portuguese: 1 636 806
05. Italian: 1 396 753
06. Japanese: 1 297 209
07. Spanish: 1 195 543
08. Russian: 1 112 441
09. Dutch: 1 079 961
10. Polish: 914 017
11. Swedish: 693 383
12. Chinese: 673 048
[ My comment: ] No significant change, other than Polish and Spanish get more sensible rankings.
Depth factor:
"The "Depth" column ((Edits/Articles) × (Non-Articles/Articles) × (Stub-ratio)) is a rough indicator of a Wikipedia’s quality, showing how frequently its articles are updated" — in short, it's an indicator of Wiki collaborativeness;
01. English: 374
02. French: 105
03. German: 78
04. Spanish: 73
05. Russian: 66
06. Chinese 62
07. Portuguese: 61
08. Italian: 50
09. Japanese: 39
10. Dutch: 21
11. Swedish: 20
12. Polish: 8
[ My comment: ] Yep, there was something fishy with Polish!
Users:
01. English: 7 716 575
02. Spanish: 797 157
03. German: 601 619
04. Chinese: 492 713
05. French: 441 318
06. Portuguese: 432 966
07. Italian: 296 668
08. Japanese: 236 024
09. Polish: 211 656
10. Dutch: 182 725
11. Russian: 156 482
12. Swedish: 73 444
[ My comment: ] The Chinese and Hispanics are great users but poor contributors.