Thursday, September 11, 2003, 23:19 GMT
>>Who were more cruel, German or Japanese? At least German did not rape or burn people alive.
Yeah, they just stuck people in gas ovens, used babies for target practice, and conducted biological experiments on their prisoners...(!!!)
The Germans DID rape people – it is a war tactic used to terrorize the enemy. In turn, East German women were raped by the conquering Red Army several years later. How can anyone compare who was the cruelest – they both committed atrocities. ALL conquering nations commit heinous acts, that is how they expand their borders and subjugate people. How many people did Chairman Mao eliminate during his Cultural Revolution?
Re: France – Remember, France during Louis XIV reign, was the strongest, most influential kingdom in all of Europe. And of course, there was Napoleon who conquered much of Europe and claimed it as his empire. Not to mention all the overseas lands that France conquered and colonized over the years. So I don't think its fair to dismiss France as weak simply because they were trounced by a more powerful army. It's also worth noting that after several internal revolutions, the overthrow of their aristocracy, the collapse of two republics, the Franco-Prussian War, and the previous World War in which over a million French soldiers gave up their lives, the French had had enough with government and politics and weren't as united in their desire to fight another war. This of course left them vulnerable.
Also, French was still the language of politics and diplomacy during WWII, so my guess is that it was the other way around -- that the English officials spoke French while communicating with the French government in exile. Either that or they used interpreters.
Since you mentioned the Chinese people fighting until the end and never surrendering, let me ask you this: Who is more heroic? a) The leader who refuses to surrender to a more powerful enemy even though his country is being completely devastated and his people annihilated; or b) the leader who realizes when he's outgunned and concedes defeat in order to spare his people any more harm and his homeland further damage?
Yeah, they just stuck people in gas ovens, used babies for target practice, and conducted biological experiments on their prisoners...(!!!)
The Germans DID rape people – it is a war tactic used to terrorize the enemy. In turn, East German women were raped by the conquering Red Army several years later. How can anyone compare who was the cruelest – they both committed atrocities. ALL conquering nations commit heinous acts, that is how they expand their borders and subjugate people. How many people did Chairman Mao eliminate during his Cultural Revolution?
Re: France – Remember, France during Louis XIV reign, was the strongest, most influential kingdom in all of Europe. And of course, there was Napoleon who conquered much of Europe and claimed it as his empire. Not to mention all the overseas lands that France conquered and colonized over the years. So I don't think its fair to dismiss France as weak simply because they were trounced by a more powerful army. It's also worth noting that after several internal revolutions, the overthrow of their aristocracy, the collapse of two republics, the Franco-Prussian War, and the previous World War in which over a million French soldiers gave up their lives, the French had had enough with government and politics and weren't as united in their desire to fight another war. This of course left them vulnerable.
Also, French was still the language of politics and diplomacy during WWII, so my guess is that it was the other way around -- that the English officials spoke French while communicating with the French government in exile. Either that or they used interpreters.
Since you mentioned the Chinese people fighting until the end and never surrendering, let me ask you this: Who is more heroic? a) The leader who refuses to surrender to a more powerful enemy even though his country is being completely devastated and his people annihilated; or b) the leader who realizes when he's outgunned and concedes defeat in order to spare his people any more harm and his homeland further damage?